Featured My beauty score is 73.5. What's yours?

Published on March 5th, 2021 📆 | 5278 Views ⚑

0

My beauty score is 73.5. What’s yours?


TTS

A comparison of two photos of Beyonce Knowles from Lauren Rhue's research using Face++. Its AI predicted the image on the left would rate at 74.776% for men and 77.914% for women. The image on the right, meanwhile, scored 87.468% for men and 91.14% for women in its model.
Ā 

Beauty scores, she says, are part of a disturbing dynamic between an already unhealthy beauty culture and the recommendation algorithms we come across every day online. When scores are used to decide whose posts get surfaced on social media platforms, for example, it reinforces the definition of what is deemed attractive and takes attention away from those who do not fit the machineā€™s strict ideal. ā€œWeā€™re narrowing the types of pictures that are available to everybody,ā€ says Rhue.

Itā€™s a vicious cycle: with more eyes on the content featuring attractive people, those images are able to gather higher engagement, so they are shown to still more people. Eventually, even when a high beauty score is not a direct reason a post is shown to you, it is an indirect factor.

In a study published in 2019, she looked at how two algorithms, one for beauty scores and one for age predictions, affected peopleā€™s opinions. Participants were shown images of people and asked to evaluate the beauty and age of the subjects. Some of the participants were shown the score generated by an AI before giving their answer, while others were not shown the AI score at all. She found that participants without knowledge of the AIā€™s rating did not exhibit additional bias; however, knowing how the AI ranked peopleā€™s attractiveness made people give scores closer to the algorithmically generated result. Rhue calls this the ā€œanchoring effect.ā€

ā€œRecommendation algorithms are actually changing what our preferences are,ā€ she says. ā€œAnd the challenge from a technology perspective, of course, is to not narrow them too much. When it comes to beauty, we are seeing much more of a narrowing than I would have expected.ā€

"I didnā€™t see any reason for not evaluating your flaws, because there are ways you can fix it."





Shafee Hassan, Qoves Studio

At Qoves, Hassan says he has tried to tackle the issue of race head on. When conducting a detailed facial analysis reportā€”the kind that clients pay forā€”his studio attempts to use data to categorize the face according to ethnicity so that everyone wonā€™t simply be evaluated against a European ideal. ā€œYou can escape this Eurocentric bias just by becoming the best-looking version of yourself, the best-looking version of your ethnicity, the best-looking version of your race,ā€ he says.

But Rhue says she worries about this kind of ethnic categorization being embedded deeper into our technological infrastructure. ā€œThe problem is, people are doing it, no matter how we look at it, and there's no type of regulation or oversight,ā€ she says. ā€œIf there is any type of strife, people will try to figure out who belongs in which category.ā€

Source link

Tagged with: ā€¢ ā€¢ ā€¢



Comments are closed.