The Federal Communications Commission has defeated another challenge to its repeal of net neutrality rules, as a federal court yesterday decided that it won't rehear the case.

In October 2019, a three-judge panel at the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the FCC's repeal of net neutrality rules. Mozilla, consumer-advocacy groups, and state attorneys general asked for a rehearing in front of all the DC Circuit court judges, but the request was denied yesterday in a very short ruling.

The petitioners could still appeal to the US Supreme Court but haven't said if they will do so. "While today's result is unfortunate, it's not that surprising," Free Press VP of Policy and General Counsel Matt Wood said. "Courts routinely deny rehearing requests like this. But we'll keep weighing our legal options."

Wood said that Free Press will also "keep making the case in Congress, in statehouses and in future FCC proceedings about the need to restore the vital nondiscrimination rules that Chairman [Ajit] Pai ripped away."

Public Knowledge Legal Director John Bergmayer similarly said, "We look forward to continuing to fight for an open Internet in Congress and in statehouses across the country—and one day working with an FCC that recognizes its important role in protecting broadband users."

States can enforce net neutrality

While the appeals court upheld the FCC's repeal of US-wide net neutrality rules, the decision in October wasn't a clean sweep for Pai. His FCC had also voted to block all current and future state net neutrality laws, but the judges said the FCC can't impose a blanket, nationwide preemption.

The FCC can still try to preempt net neutrality laws on a case-by-case basis, but Washington state and Oregon are already enforcing their own laws. California and Vermont agreed to suspend enforcement of their net neutrality laws until after all appeals in the FCC case are exhausted.