Powered by iSpeech
Blog post: https://localhost.exposed/2016/10/31/0day-fair-game-in-pentesting
I argue that using 0day exploits in a pentesting engagement is fair game if you happen upon such a scenario.
Unless they are explicitly ruled as out-of-bounds per the contract, it would be artificially limiting yourself from things that adversaries have access to anyway.
2016-10-31 15:33:40
source
Event Management 1.0 SQL Injection – Torchsec March 28, 2024 # Exploit Title: Event Management - SQL Injection# Application: Event… (11)Artica Proxy Unauthenticated PHP Deserialization… March 27, 2024 ### This module requires Metasploit: https://metasploit.com/download# Current source: https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework##class MetasploitModule… (8)Siklu MultiHaul TG Series Credential Disclosure… March 29, 2024 # Exploit Title: Siklu MultiHaul TG series - unauthenticated credential… (8)WinRAR 6.22 Remote Code Execution – Torchsec March 29, 2024 ################################################################################################# Exploit Title : EXPLOIT WinRAR version 6.22 Vulnerability CVE-2023-38831… (8)
0 Responses to 0day – fair game in pentesting?